Course Title: Negotiate translating and interpreting assignments

Part B: Course Detail

Teaching Period: Term1 2014

Course Code: LANG5760C

Course Title: Negotiate translating and interpreting assignments

School: 365T Global, Urban & Social Studies

Campus: City Campus

Program: C5328 - Diploma of Interpreting

Course Contact : Atsuko Taniguchi

Course Contact Phone: +61 3 9925 3973

Course Contact Email:atsuko.taniguchi@rmit.edu.au


Name and Contact Details of All Other Relevant Staff

Atsuko Taniguchi (atsuko.taniguchi@rmit.edu.au)
 

Auslan group:
-Meredith Bartlett ( meredith.bartlett@rmit.edu.au)


On-line group:
-Bum Lee ( bum.lee@rmit.edu.au)
 

Nominal Hours: 25

Regardless of the mode of delivery, represent a guide to the relative teaching time and student effort required to successfully achieve a particular competency/module. This may include not only scheduled classes or workplace visits but also the amount of effort required to undertake, evaluate and complete all assessment requirements, including any non-classroom activities.

Pre-requisites and Co-requisites

None

Course Description

This unit covers skills and knowledge required to prepare for assignments and develop effective work plan and develop resources for translating and interpreting assignments. This unit will be taught in a cluster with the following units.

PSPTIS504A Maintain and enhance professional practice
PSPTIS501A Negotiate translating and interpreting assignments
PSPTIS503A Apply codes and standards to ethical practice
PSPTIS507A Manage discourse in general settings
 


National Codes, Titles, Elements and Performance Criteria

National Element Code & Title:

PSPTIS501A Negotiate translating and interpreting assignments

Element:

1. Collect and assess assignment information.

Performance Criteria:

1.1. Clarify the scope of assignments with clients, including languages, terms and conditions, and any specific requirements.
1.2. Analyse background information for details of the nature and conditions of assignments.
1.3. Provide information to clients on terms, conditions and conventions to reach an agreed approach.
1.4. Identify performance expectations and their implications for undertaking the assignment.
 

Element:

2. Assess ability to complete assignment.

Performance Criteria:

2.1. Evaluate personal competence and preparedness to satisfy assignment requirements and areas for negotiation with clients.
2.2. Identify and assess limits and responsibility, and their implications.
2.3. Seek advice to inform decision-making process.
 

Element:

3. Respond to assignment proposal.

Performance Criteria:

3.1. Review and maintain a record of decision-making process.
3.2. Advise client or agency of decision to accept or decline the assignment in a professional and timely manner.
 


Learning Outcomes



Details of Learning Activities

You will participate in various learning activities including: lectures, tutorials, practical demonstrations, class discussions, and group/individual work.
Online groups only - learning activities are listed on the blackboard shell for the program in a folder titled Learning Activities. Each activity requires students to undertake a task and report back. Activities may include quizzes, site visits, discussion board entries, research reports, journals.
 


Teaching Schedule

Full Time Clustered Teaching Schedule
The delivery of this unit will be undertaken with Prepare to Interpret and Translate and Maintain and enhance Professional Practice assignments. The units may be delivered concurrently.
 

No Lesson Units Assessments
1 Collect and assess assignment information.                                                                       Negotiate translating and interpreting assignments                            Assessment 1: Simulated interpreting practice observation
Commencing in Week 1

Assessment 2: Mock interpreting report
 

2 Assess ability to complete assignment
3 Respond to assignment proposal.
4 Analyse assignment information for planning purposes Prepare to translate and interpret
5 Establish familiarity with topic and context.
6 Develop work plan
7 Review and evaluate work plan
8 Develop knowledge of ethical and professional issues. Apply codes and standards to ethical practice
9 Apply ethical standards to professional practices.
10 Evaluate professional practices and knowledge related to ethical practice
11 Model high standards of performance Maintain and enhance Professional Practice
12 Determine personal development needs.
13 Participate in professional development activities
14 Reflect on and evaluate professional practice

Online Group Teaching Schedule
For online delivery this unit will be covered as an individual course.
 

No Lesson Assessment
1 Collect and assess assignment information.
Clarify the scope of assignments with clients, including languages, terms and conditions, and any specific requirements.

Analyse background information for details of the nature and conditions of assignments.

Provide information to clients on terms, conditions and conventions to reach an agreed approach.

Identify performance expectations and their implications for undertaking the assignment.
 

                                                                    
Assessment 1: Online Quiz on the course content in the study guide. Due by week 3.

Assessment 2: Getting started with interpreting – How to accept an assignment and to prepare for interpreting. This task involves peer review.
Due by week 6

Assessment Task 3 : Reflective Journal
Due by week 8

 

 

2 Assess ability to complete assignment
Evaluate personal competence and preparedness to satisfy assignment requirements and areas for negotiation with clients.

Identify and assess limits and responsibility, and their implications.

Seek advice to inform decision-making process.
 

3 Respond to assignment proposal.
Review and maintain a record of decision-making process.

Advise client or agency of decision to accept or decline the assignment in a professional and timely manner.
                                                                                              


 


 


Learning Resources

Prescribed Texts

Learning material will be provided in class.


References

Gentile, A., Ozolins, U., & Vasilakakos, M, Liaison Interpreting, A Handbook, Melbourne University Press, 1996 AUSIT Code of Ethics and Practice


Other Resources

The unit is supported online using Blackboard. The Blackboard gives access to important announcements, staff contacts details, the teaching schedule, assessment timelines and a variety of important teaching and learning materials. Access to Blackboard can be found at myRMIT www.rmit.edu.au/myrmit


Overview of Assessment

Assessment will be ongoing during the semester, and you will receive feedback on your progress. You will undertake a variety of assessment tasks and activities to assess your level of competence against key elements and performance criteria.

Assessment tasks may include, but not limited to, the following:

- teacher directed group activities
- practical exercises
- group discussions
- preparing assignment specific portfolios
- visiting/researching potential workplaces in preparation for an assignment and identify needs for preparation
 


Assessment Tasks

Assessment for Full Time group

Assessment 1 – Simulated interpreting practice observation
From Week 1 onwards you will be observed in simulated interpreting practice as part of the class activity.
Observation list will be provided with expected standard to achieve a CA (Competency Achieved) for this assessment task.

Assessment 2 – Mock interpreting report
Assessment 2 designed to cover some of the main professional practice issues in negotiating and accepting/denying translating and interpreting assignments and preparing for assignments in a structured process. It is a simulated assignment and you are expected to negotiate/confirm the assignment information, accept the assignment and prepare for the assignment as a professional interpreter.
You are required to simulate as a practicing professional interpreter by accepting an interpreting assignment from an interpreting agency. You will be guided by a report template where you are expected to follow the steps and provide action/response on the questions provided. Word count requirement: minimum 700 words in total of all your answers.

You will be assessed ‘CA’ Competent or NYC (Not Competent Yet) for this assessment

Online Group Assessment Tasks

Assessment 1 : Online Quiz
You are required to complete online quiz after reading the course content in the study guide provided.
You will be assessed Competent or Non-Competent for this assessment.
You will be assessed Competent if you get at least 90% of questions correct. 
This assessment is due by week 3.

Assessment 2: Getting started with interpreting – How to accept an assignment and to prepare for interpreting.
This assessment task is for UNIT 1 and 2.
You have been asked to interpret for a NES client who is applying for public housing. You will be provided with template includes criteria to assist you in this assessment.
This is an assessment task, due by week 6.
You will be assessed ‘C’ Competent or NYC (Not Competent Yet) for this assessment.

Assessment Task 3 : Reflective Journal
You are expected to record your personal learning journey, tracking and documenting an evolving understanding of the this unit. Each student will be allocated one personal journal with privacy setting. You will be guided by reflection questions for each unit posted by Course coordinator.
This assessment task is due by week 8.
You will be assessed ‘C’ Competent or NYC (Not Competent Yet) for this assessment
 


Assessment Matrix

  Full Time Group Online Group
Elements Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Assessment 3
Collect and assess assignment information                                                 X  X  X  X  X
Assess ability to complete assignment  X  X  X  X  X
Respond to assignment proposal  X  X  X  X  X

Other Information

GRADING INFORMATION

This course uses a competency-based assessment and will be graded as follows:
CA (Competency Achieved)
NYC (Not Yet Competent)
DNS (Did Not Submit)

All competency-based assessment tasks for this course must be completed at the required level (see the elements and key performance criteria for each unit) in order to achieve a CA (Competency Achieved) award.If a student has not completed ALL the assessment tasks or they have completed but some or all are not at the required level, they will be assessed as NYC (Not Yet Competent).

If a student does not submit assessment tasks at all, a DNS result will be entered.
Learning Resources
RMIT Library
The University Library provides extensive services, facilities and study space as well as comprehensive collections of books, periodicals and other course related materials, such as DVD’s, magazines, slides, films etc. Computer laboratories with access to a wide range of desktop publishing software are also available. The library also has an expanding virtual collection of electronic resources and networks, including product data, e-books, electronic journals and newspapers, web based tutorials, online reference and document delivery services etc., all of which are accessible on campus, and off campus 24 hours per day. More information on library resources and services can be found at: http://www.rmit.edu.au/library
The Learning Lab is a collection of web-based resources including tip sheets and interactive tutorials on study skills, writing, English language development and maths. Access RMIT’s Learning Lab online via this link: http://www.dlsweb.rmit.edu.au/lsu/

Assessment Tasks : Applying for an Extension
Extension of time for assessment tasks may be granted where circumstances beyond your control prevent submission by the published due date. An application for extension of time must be lodged with your tutor or the course coordinator as early as possible, and no later than one working day before the due date for submission.
You can apply for extension using the University’s Extension Application Form – http://mams.rmit.edu.au/seca86tti4g4z.pdf – or by emailing your course coordinator or tutor directly.
An extension of up to seven calendar days may be granted if good reason can be demonstrated. Include supporting evidence (such as medical certificates) with your application.
Extensions beyond seven calendar days cannot be granted by course coordinators, tutors or the School. To apply for an extension of time greater than seven calendar days you must lodge an application for Special Consideration.
Applying for Special Consideration
If you are seeking an extension of more than seven calendar days (from the original due date) you must lodge an Application for Special Consideration form, preferably prior to, but no later than two working days after the official due date. Late applications will only be accepted in exceptional circumstances. For information about Special Consideration and how to apply, see: http://www.rmit.edu.au/students/specialconsideration
Penalties for Late Submission
If you have not been granted an extension or special consideration, late submission will be penalised as follows:
1. Assessment tasks submitted after the due date of submission shall receive a penalty of five per cent of the grades available for that assessment per day for each day late.
2. No assessment task shall be accepted more than three weeks after the due date without special consideration.
Assessment Appeals
If you believe your assessment result or final result is wrong please contact the course coordinator and provide the reason why you think your result is incorrect. Valid reasons for seeking a review of results include:
a) You believe an error has occurred in the calculation of the grade; or,
b) You believe the assessment did not comply with criteria published in the Course Guide; or,
c) You believe the assessment did not comply with University Policies on Assessment (i.e. an error in process has occurred).
Full details of the procedure (including appeals procedure) can be located at this RMIT site: http://www.rmit.edu.au/policies/academic#assessment

Other Relevant Information

Academic Integrity
Academic integrity means honesty and responsibility in scholarship through respecting the work of others whilst having the freedom to build new insights, new knowledge and ideas. RMIT University upholds the values of academic integrity as fundamental to the scholarship undertaken by all members of its community. Whenever you refer to another person’s research or ideas (either by directly quoting or paraphrasing them) you must acknowledge your source.
If you are even in doubt about how to properly cite a reference, consult your lecturer or the academic integrity website: http://www.rmit.edu.au/academicintegrity The RMIT library provides tools to assist with your referencing http://www.rmit.edu.au/library/info-trek/referencing
Plagiarism and Collusion
Plagiarism and collusion constitute extremely serious academic misconduct, and are forms of cheating. You are reminded that cheating, whether by fabrication, falsification of data, or plagiarism, is an offence subject to University disciplinary procedures. Plagiarism is the presentation of the work, idea or creation of another person as though it is your own. It is a form of cheating and is a very serious academic offence that may lead to expulsion from the University. Plagiarised material can be drawn from, and presented in, written, graphic and visual form, including electronic data, and oral presentations. Plagiarism occurs when the origin of the material used is not appropriately cited. Plagiarism is not acceptable.
Examples of plagiarism include:
Copying sentences or paragraphs word-for-word from one or more sources, whether published or unpublished, which could include but is not limited to books, journals, reports, theses, websites, conference papers, course notes, etc. without proper citation;

  • Closely paraphrasing sentences, paragraphs, ideas or themes without proper citation;
  • Piecing together text from one or more sources and adding only linking sentences;
  • Copying or submitting whole or parts of computer files without acknowledging their source;
  • Copying designs or works of art and submitting them as your original work;
  • Copying a whole or any part of another student’s work; and
  • Submitting work as your own that someone else has done for you.
  • Enabling Plagiarism: the act of assisting or allowing another person to plagiarise or to copy your own work is also an offence.

For further information, please see the RMIT Plagiarism Policy – http://www.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=sg4yfqzod48g1 – and the RMIT Student Discipline Statute and Regulations - http://www.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=11jgnnjgg70y

Plagiarism Software
The originality verification software Turnitin may be used in this course. For details, see: http://www.turnitin.com
Complaints Procedure:
RMIT University is committed to providing a harmonious study and work environment for all students and staff. The University recognises your right to raise concerns about academic, administrative or support services without recrimination and has policies and procedures to assist in the resolution of complaints.
Most issues are resolved at the local level and you are encouraged to take steps to resolve your issue locally. The student complaint procedure details steps to take if your problem is not resolved or you believe the response you received is unreasonable.
Student Complaints Policy: http://www.rmit.edu.au/policies/studentcomplaintspolicy
Student complaints Procedure: http://www.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=i1lexipvjt22
Student Complaints Form: http://mams.rmit.edu.au/v4ujvmyojugxz.pdf

 

Course Overview: Access Course Overview