Course Title: Apply Investigative Processes in a Justice Environment

Part B: Course Detail

Teaching Period: Term1 2013

Course Code: JUST5143

Course Title: Apply Investigative Processes in a Justice Environment

School: 365T Global Studies, Soc Sci & Plng

Campus: City Campus

Program: C6077 - Advanced Diploma of Justice

Course Contact : Georgy Dumas

Course Contact Phone: +61 3 99254203

Course Contact Email:georgy.dumas@rmit.edu.au


Name and Contact Details of All Other Relevant Staff

Nominal Hours: 75

Regardless of the mode of delivery, represent a guide to the relative teaching time and student effort required to successfully achieve a particular competency/module. This may include not only scheduled classes or workplace visits but also the amount of effort required to undertake, evaluate and complete all assessment requirements, including any non-classroom activities.

Pre-requisites and Co-requisites

  • Work in a Legal Environment

Course Description

This course covers the skills and knowledge required to examine and apply the Investigative Skills and procedures to conduct an investigation: to gather, record and present evidence in a court of law, together with an understanding of the witness’ responsibility and privacy and confidentiality issues.


National Codes, Titles, Elements and Performance Criteria

National Element Code & Title:

VBQU368 Apply Investigative Processes in a Justice Environment

Element:

01 Examine the role of an Investigator in a Criminal Justice Environment

Performance Criteria:

The role of the investigator and the challenges confronting current investigations are identified.

The aims and process of investigations are identified.

An analysis is conducted on the legal boundaries and framework that governs investigative procedure and policies.

Element:

02 Investigate the Ethical Issues confronting an Investigator 

Performance Criteria:

The role of ethics and the need for high levels of accountability in investigation is examined.

Ethical dilemmas confronting the investigator are examined.

Avenues available to the community relating to complaints against the investigator are investigated.

Legislation which regulates investigators is identified.

An analysis is conducted to identify the similarities and/or differences between government and non government investigators.

Element:

03 Evaluate the provisions relating to confidential information and Privacy legislation

Performance Criteria:

Legislation relating to access and dissemination of information is identified.

The provision relating to the exchange of information between organizations is examined.

State and Federal legislation which impact on the obtaining of information and gathering of intelligence is identified.

Current privacy legislation and provisions which impact on the duties of the investigator are analysed

Element:

04 Identify and apply the processes used to gather and record Evidence are identified

Performance Criteria:

The legal process used to gather and record evidence is identified.

The different points of proof required to substantiate a criminal charge are investigated.

The laws relating to arrest, search and seizure by authorized officers are examined.

The legal requirements for a criminal brief are determined.

The process of taking comprehensive and legally admissible statements is applied within a criminal justice enviro

Element:

05 Analyse the processes and requirements of notetaking in Criminal and Civil hearings

Performance Criteria:

The role and process of notetaking for authorised officers is identified.

The admissibility of notes in Criminal and Civil hearings is identified.

The legal requirements for the formation of a witness statement, which is admissible in court, is investigated.

The rules for taking and recording witness statements are outlined.

A witness statement which would be admissible in court is constructed.

The role of a jurat in statements is clarified

Element:

06 Identify and apply the processes, methodology and legal obligations in conducting interviews

Performance Criteria:

The legal obligations in conducting interviews are identified.
The interview protocols and procedures are identified.

The need for an interview plan is clarified.

The methods require to record interviews are outlined.

Interviews are planned and conduct

Element:

07 Identify and implement the procedures, duties and  legal and ethical responsibilities of persons and parties involved in Criminal or Civil Court hearings

Performance Criteria:

The functions and responsibilities of persons and parties involved in a criminal hearing and a civil proceeding are identified.

The methods of arraignment for a defendant to appear before a court of law are outlined.

The three stages of evidence that a witness can give in a court of law are identified.

The legal and ethical responsibilities of a witness in civil and criminal proceedings are examined.

The sequence of hearing and contested, non-contested and ex-parte hearing in a court of law is clarified.

A Coroner’s inquest, the mention Court System and Committal Court procedure is outlined.

The legal requirement for a “Voir Dire” hearing in a court of law is identified.

The Oath and Affirmation legislation required to be administered before a witness can give evidence in a court of law is identified.

Appeals, orders to review and rehearing decisions of matters heard and determined in a court of law are investigated.

Pre-court and in-court procedures for witnesses are identified.

A moot court which includes the application of evidential, ethical and statutory law requirements is prepared and conducted.
 


Learning Outcomes


  • See elements


Details of Learning Activities

Students will participate in a variety of teaching methods including: lectures, tutorials, class discussion, seminar presentations, group/individual work on projects, audio-visual presentations, field excursions where applicable, on site visits, and interaction with individuals and groups within the criminal justice area.
 


Teaching Schedule

Session 1:  Overview of unit and assessment tasks

Session 2: The role of the investigator and outline of the legal boundaries that govern investigative procedure and policies

Session 3: Identification of the aims and processes of investigation

Session 4: Examination of the legislation that governs investigators and the ethical dilemmas that confront investigators

                     Similarities and differences  between government and non-government investigators

Session 5: Identification of state and federal legislation that impacts on obtaining information and intelligence gathering

                     Identification of confidentiality and privacy legislation that impacts on the duties of the investigator

Session 6:  Examination of the legal processes used to gather and record evidence

Session 7: Identification of the diffferent points of proof that are required to substantiate a criminal charge

Session 8: Examination of the relevant acts of legislation relating to arrest, search and seizure by authorised officers

Session 9: Outline of the legal requirements for a criminal brief of evidence

Session 10: Outline of the process of taking comprehensive and legally adminissable statements

Session 11: The legal requirements for the preparation of a witness statement which are admissible in court

                       An outline of the rules for taking and recording witness statements

                        Interview protocols and procedures and the methods to record interviews


Session 12: Identification of the role of a jurat in statements

                      Outline of the key responsibilities of persons involved in criminal proceedings

                      Outline of methods of arraignment for a defendant to appear before a Court

Session 14: Identification of the three stages of evidence that witnesses can provide

Session 15: Examination of the sequence of hearing for contested, non-contested and ex-parte hearing in Court

                       Identification of ’Voir Dire" hearing in a court

Session 17: Outline of pre-Court and in-court procedures

                        Appeals and order to review including Coroner’s inquest, the mention Court system and committal Court procedure

                       Moot Court simulation for the presentation of evidential, ethical and statutory law requirements

Session 18: Review of unit

 

                        

 

         


Learning Resources

Prescribed Texts

Victorian Criminal Procedure: State and Federal Law, Melbourne, Monash Law Book Co-operative Ltd.,(13th edn) 2010, pp. i-xxxii, 1-540


References


Other Resources

 

Additional resources will be provided to students in class and via ’Blackboard’ to supplement learning outcomes as required


Overview of Assessment

Assessment for this course will include:

  • Weekly "challenge" tests to ensure understanding of underpinning legislative and procedural requirements to Industry standards
  • Progressive development of the elements  of a Brief of Evidence to Industry standards
  • Examination
  • Completion of a comprehensive Brief of Evidence to a standard for submission and presentation in a Court of Law


Assessment Tasks

Assessment for this course will include:

Weekly "challenge" tests to ensure understanding of underpinning legislative and procedural requirements to Industry standards
Progressive development of the elements of a Brief of Evidence to Industry standards
Examination
Completion of a comprehensive Brief of Evidence to a standard for submission and presentation in a Court of Law


Assessment Matrix

The assessment has been designed to cover all learning outcomes and will be graded in accordance with RMIT University’s Mark Table 7 which is as follows:

HD 80 – 100
D 70 - 79
C 60 - 69
PA 50 - 59
NN 0 - 49

 

Other Information

All written work must adhere to the following criteria:
1. Written reports, research projects or essays are to demonstrate an understanding of the concepts and familiarity with the prescribed or negotiated topics
2. It is expected that all submitted work will be well written, with clear and consistent grammar, expression and punctuation. It must be well structured and cogently address the issues raised in the chosen topic in a logical, ordered and organised manner
3. The concepts must be well defined and demonstrate a critical analysis of the chosen topic
4. Written submissions must demonstrate appropriate preparation, reading and research
5. In-text references must follow the APA style of referencing. In addition, you must provide a bibliography with correct and comprehensive details in relation to texts, articles, research reports and other sources that you have used
6. Double or 1.5 spacing and a font size of 10-12 must be used in either Arial or Times Roman. Do not submit double paged assessments.

Extensions
In accordance with RMIT policy, you may apply for an extension where there have been unexpected or extenuating circumstances, e.g.
• Hospital admission, serious injury, severe asthma, severe anxiety or depression. This does not include minor illness such as a cold, period pain or hay fever.
• Loss or bereavement – e.g. death of a close family member, family/relationship breakdown.
• Hardship/trauma – e.g. victim of crime, sudden loss of income or employment, severe disruption to domestic arrangements.
You must keep a copy of their assessment until the graded submission has been returned or marks have been posted.

All email communications will be sent to your RMIT student email address.

Applying for an Extension
Extension of time for assessment tasks may be granted where circumstances beyond your control prevent submission by the published due date. An application for extension of time must be lodged with your tutor or the course coordinator as early as possible, and no later than one working day before the due date for submission.
You can apply for extension using the University’s Extension Application Form – http://mams.rmit.edu.au/seca86tti4g4z.pdf – or by emailing your course coordinator or tutor directly.
An extension of up to seven calendar days may be granted if good reason can be demonstrated. Include supporting evidence (such as medical certificates) with your application.
Extensions beyond seven calendar days cannot be granted by course coordinators, tutors or the School. To apply for an extension of time greater than seven calendar days you must lodge an application for Special Consideration.

Applying for Special Consideration
If you are seeking an extension of more than seven calendar days (from the original due date) you must lodge an Application for Special Consideration form, preferably prior to, but no later than two working days after the official due date. Late applications will only be accepted in exceptional circumstances. For information about Special Consideration and how to apply, see: http://www.rmit.edu.au/students/specialconsideration

Penalties for Late Submission
If you have not been granted an extension or special consideration, late submission will be penalised as follows:
Assessment tasks submitted after the due date of submission shall receive a penalty of five per cent of the grades available for that assessment per day for each working day late.
No assessment task shall be accepted more than three weeks after the due date.

Assessment Appeals
If you believe your assessment result or final result is wrong please contact the course coordinator and provide the reason why you think your result is incorrect. Valid reasons for seeking a review of results include:
• You believe an error has occurred in the calculation of the grade; or,

• You believe the assessment did not comply with criteria published in the Course Guide; or,

• You believe the assessment did not comply with University Policies on Assessment (i.e. an error in process has occurred).

• Full details of the procedure (including appeals procedure) can be located at this RMIT site: http://www.rmit.edu.au/policies/academic#assessment

Academic Integrity
Academic integrity means honesty and responsibility in scholarship through respecting the work of others whilst having the freedom to build new insights, new knowledge and ideas. RMIT University upholds the values of academic integrity as fundamental to the scholarship undertaken by all members of its community. Whenever you refer to another person’s research or ideas (either by directly quoting or paraphrasing them) you must acknowledge your source.
If you are even in doubt about how to properly cite a reference, consult your lecturer or the academic integrity website: http://www.rmit.edu.au/academicintegrity
The RMIT library provides tools to assist with your referencing http://www.rmit.edu.au/library/info-trek/referencing

Plagiarism and Collusion
Plagiarism and collusion constitute extremely serious academic misconduct, and are forms of cheating. You are reminded that cheating, whether by fabrication, falsification of data, or plagiarism, is an offence subject to University disciplinary procedures. Plagiarism is the presentation of the work, idea or creation of another person as though it is your own. It is a form of cheating and is a very serious academic offence that may lead to expulsion from the University. Plagiarised material can be drawn from, and presented in, written, graphic and visual form, including electronic data, and oral presentations. Plagiarism occurs when the origin of the material used is not appropriately cited. Plagiarism is not acceptable.
Examples of plagiarism include:
• Copying sentences or paragraphs word-for-word from one or more sources, whether published or unpublished, which could include but is not limited to books, journals, reports, theses, websites, conference papers, course notes, etc. without proper citation;
• Closely paraphrasing sentences, paragraphs, ideas or themes without proper citation;
• Piecing together text from one or more sources and adding only linking sentences;
• Copying or submitting whole or parts of computer files without acknowledging their source;
• Copying designs or works of art and submitting them as your original work;
• Copying a whole or any part of another student’s work; and
• Submitting work as your own that someone else has done for you.
• Enabling Plagiarism: the act of assisting or allowing another person to plagiarise or to copy your own work is also an offence.
For further information, please see the RMIT Plagiarism Policy – http://www.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=sg4yfqzod48g1 – and the RMIT Student Discipline Statute and Regulations - http://www.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=11jgnnjgg70y

Plagiarism Software
The originality verification software Turnitin may be used in this course. For details, see: http://www.turnitin.com



 

Course Overview: Access Course Overview