Course Title: Manage natural area restoration programs
Part B: Course Detail
Teaching Period: Term2 2009
Course Code: ENVI5052C
Course Title: Manage natural area restoration programs
School: 155T Life & Physical Sciences
Campus: City Campus
Program: C5161 - Diploma of Conservation and Land Management
Course Contact : Judith McCann
Course Contact Phone: +61 3 99258366
Course Contact Email:judith.mccann@rmit.edu.au
Name and Contact Details of All Other Relevant Staff
Nevil Schultz: nevil.schultz@rmit.edu.au
Nominal Hours: 200
Regardless of the mode of delivery, represent a guide to the relative teaching time and student effort required to successfully achieve a particular competency/module. This may include not only scheduled classes or workplace visits but also the amount of effort required to undertake, evaluate and complete all assessment requirements, including any non-classroom activities.
Pre-requisites and Co-requisites
There are none for this course
Course Description
This competency standard covers the process of managing natural arearestoration programs. It requires the ability to inspect and assess site for the replacement of vegetation, plan natural area restoration program, monitor natural area restoration works, and review the natural area restoration program. Managing natural area restoration programs requires a knowledge of natural area restoration techniques, identification of plant and animal threats to treated areas, soils and nutrients, plant selection and culture, calculations for materials, preparation of plans and specifications and project management.
National Codes, Titles, Elements and Performance Criteria
National Element Code & Title: |
RTD5003A Manage natural area restoration programs |
Element: |
1. Inspect and assess site for replacement of vegetation |
Performance Criteria: |
1.1 A vegetation assessment report is prepared. |
Element: |
2. Plan natural area restoration program |
Performance Criteria: |
2.1 Plans and specifications for natural area restoration works are prepared according to program/management aims and objectives. |
Element: |
3. Monitor natural area restoration works |
Performance Criteria: |
3.1 Observations are made according to natural area restoration plans and to enterprise procedures. |
Element: |
4, Review natural area restoration program |
Performance Criteria: |
4.1 Site is monitored to ensure compliance with maintenance program plans and specifications or enterprise guidelines. |
Learning Outcomes
These are listed as competencies for this course
Details of Learning Activities
Learning activities will cover a range of activities including: lectures, class pracs, guest speakers, field trips and field work.
NB: This course is run on the same day as "Undertake Sampling and Testing of Water". A number of classes have been dedicated to full day Water Testing Field Trips.
Teaching Schedule
Week | Date | Content |
1 | 15/7/09 |
Course Outline Understaning Restoration in the Australian Context |
2 | 22/7/09 | Restoration Principles |
3 | 29/7/09 | Understanding your site and planning for restoration |
4 | 5/8/09 |
Field Trip Latrobe Wildlife Reserve |
5 | 12/8/09 | Woodlands and the issues around dieback |
6 | 19/8/09 | Water Testing |
7 | 26/8/09 | Combating Salinity |
8 | 2/9/09 |
Field Trip Westernport Seagrass Restoration Project |
9 | 9/9/09 |
Field Work Introduction to Burke Rd Billabong |
10 | 16/9/09 | Coastal Restoration |
MID SEMESTER BREAK | ||
11 | 30/9/09 | Water Testing |
12 | 7/10/09 |
Field Work Burke Rd Billabong |
13 | 14/10/09 |
Field Work Burke Rd Billabong |
14 | 21/10/09 | Work Placements |
15 | 28/10/09 | Water Testing |
16 | 4/11/09 | Genetic Diversity and Island Populations |
17 | 11/11/09 | Class Presentations |
18 | 18/11/09 | END SEMESTER |
Learning Resources
Prescribed Texts
References
Barr N & Cary J. 1992. Greening a Brown Land: an Australian search for sustainable land use. Macmillan Education Australia Pty Lty, Sth Melbourne, Vic, Australia. |
|
Bradley, J. 1998. Bringing back THE BUSH – The Bradley method of bush regeneration. Lansdowne – Rigby Publishers, NSW, Australia. |
|
Buchanan, R. A. 1989. Bush Regeneration – Recovering Australian Landscapes. Open Training and Education Network, TAFE, NSW, Australia. |
|
Department of Conservation and Environment. 1990. Remnant Native Grasslands and Grassy Woodlands of the Melbourne Area – an action plan for conservation based on biological values. Victorian Government Publication, Vic. |
|
Lindenmayer, D. and Burgman, M. 2005. Practical Conservation Biology. CSIRO Publishing, Victoria, Australia. |
|
Stephens, S. and Maxwell, S. (eds), 1996. Back from the Brink – Refining the Threatened Species Recovery Process. Surrey Beatty & Sons Pty Ltd, NSW, Australia. |
Other Resources
WEBSITES:
Society for Ecological Restoration online:
htpp://www.ser.org
SER Restoration Primer
http://www.ser.org/content/ecological_restoration_primer.asp
Online journals :
Restoration Ecology
Thinking Bush
Journal of Applied Ecology
Conservation
Overview of Assessment
Assessment for this course may include assignments, proect reports, tests and quizzes
Assessment Tasks
ASSESSMENT 1.
CASE STUDIES OF RESTORATION SITES.
In the first half of the semester we study 4 different sites that have undergone or are currently undergoing restoration work.
You are to choose 2 of these sites and provide comprehensive answers – with references - to the following questions for each site.
Each site should be treated as a separate case study – ie. You should hand in two documents – one for each site.
REMEMBER: You have been provided with a list of reference books, articles and websites to ensure that you provide informed and accurate information.
1. Provide an ecological historical background for the site. This should include past land uses, and discussion regarding the original flora/fauna of the site.
2. What were/are the main objectives of the restoration program. Describe them.
3. Outline the major threats to ecosystem functioning at the site. Eg. Weed invasion, urban encroachment.
4. What ‘normal’ periodic stress may occur at the site?
5. Outline the restoration methods that are being applied at the site? Discuss why they are seen as appropriate
6. Outline some of the successes and some of the failures of restoration at the site?
7. The term ‘restoration’ is used to describe many land management projects. Using the definitions of restoration outlined by Buchanan and Bradley and the SER Restoration Primer would you describe this project as a restoration project? Discuss.
ASSESSMENT 2.
WRITTEN REPORT ON BURKE RD BILLABONG RESTORATION PROJECT
Week 1
1. Draw a diagram of your area and colour code the quality of the vegetation using the attached colour coded rating system and rating matrix.
2. Make a list of 6 weeds which you wish to target at your site.
3. Identify whether you have any significant vegetation on your site.
Week 2
Outline some of the issues assisting and or hindering restoration of the site.
Week 3
Develop a matrix that outlines the major management issues that should be tackled at your site over a 3 year period. Use the matrix to prioritise work and outline strategies that you would apply to achieve the work. This could include aspects such as:
- timing of weed control to avoid seeding periods of certain species
- plant species that you may wish to introduce to enhance the site
- information that you may need to give to indigenous nurseries to ensure that plant species are ready for seasonal planting etc.
- protection processes for certain species
- Include any other strategies that you wish to introduce that might enhance the restoration process?
Week 4
Provide a brief discussion on whether restoring small urban sites, such as Burke Rd Billabong, is an appropriate use of time resources and $$.
(NB:USE REFERENCES TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT).
ASSESSMENT 3.
RESTORATION POSTER OR POWER POINT AND CLASS PRESENTATION.
This assessment is to be done in groups of 3 or 4.
You are to develop a digital or quality free hand poster OR a power point presentation which outlines the steps required to restore a specific ecosystem, eg. Wetlands, grasslands.
Each group will present the poster/powerpoint to the class.
Assessment will be in the form of a peer review – where members of the class will review each other’s work.
The presentation must be NO LONGER than 10 minutes and ALL members of the group MUST present.
Assessment Matrix
Course Overview: Access Course Overview